You are currently browsing the monthly archive for February 2009.
LATEST PRESS RELEASE from QUARK EXPEDITIONS:
February 23, 2009 at 11:00 EST
Update on the Incident Involving M/V Ocean Nova
Clipper Adventurer, carrying Ocean Nova’s passengers, arrived at the port of Ushuaia on Sunday February 22, 2009, at 7:20 AM local time. Ocean Nova’s guests spent the night at the Albatros Hotel and are continuing their homebound journey today, February 23, 2009.
Ocean Nova also arrived at the port of Ushuaia on Sunday February 22, 2009. Divers conducted an extensive underwater survey of the ship’s hull, identifying four indented areas and flaking of the keel’s paint. The survey confirmed that the rudder and the propeller were not affected by the grounding.
Repairs of the affected areas are currently being performed in Ushuaia and are expected to take three days. Consequently, Ocean Nova’s next Antarctic voyage originally scheduled to depart today has been cancelled. Quark Expeditions has re-booked passengers on M/V Polar Star‘s next voyage, which departs tomorrow, February 24, 2009. Polar Star is operated by Polar Star Expeditions, of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Quark Expeditions is providing passengers with hotel accommodation for tonight, and is rearranging the passengers’ return flights.
In comments to our February 14, 2009 post — “Climate change even worse than predicted” — it was noted that there continues to be much media abuse/misuse of scientific data that, clearly, reveal the human contribution to our planet’s warming, as well as the problem of nonexistent data cited by some in the media to deny the scientific record.
The most recent instance of the latter is/was George Will’s February 15, 2009 op-ed piece in the WASHINGTON POST (“Dark Green Doomsayers”), which touted recent data on global sea ice increases to rail against “eco-pessimists.” As it happens, the data Mr. Will cite support the opposite conclusion, that global sea ice is decreasing.
Today’s “Wrinkle” blog post by Carl Zimmer in DISCOVER elaborates on Mr. Will’s misleading statements and his misreading of the science.